AI / Automation Approval
Know what your AI-connected automations can access — before they scale.
Automations connected to AI services and external endpoints are already running in production. The question isn't whether to adopt — it's whether you have evidence of what they can reach, where permissions have drifted, and what needs to change.
Start 30-Day EvaluationStandard identity governance wasn't built for this.
No human principal. No traditional access request. No lifecycle tied to an employee.
External reach — to LLM endpoints, AI services, third-party APIs — was often never part of the original security review.
What the platform surfaces
Already applies to what you're running today.
- → Existing workflows extended to reach AI endpoints
- → Service accounts whose scope has grown over time
- → Automations whose owners have departed
Validate automation and AI workflows before production deployment with evidence-based security review.
Findings your team can act on immediately.
Prioritized by real impact
Every finding tied to a specific automation, identity, and execution path — with the evidence to prove it
Remediation guidance included
Structural actions that reduce exposure without disrupting running processes
Workflow-ready format
Structured for direct handoff into ServiceNow, JIRA, or your existing remediation process
Executive-ready evidence
One-line business risk statements. Audit-grade documentation for leadership and compliance
This is relevant if…
- You are deploying AI-connected automation (Azure AI, Foundry, OpenAI, Copilot) and need to validate the access scope before production
- Existing automations now reach LLM or AI endpoints that were not part of their original design
- You need evidence of which automation paths have external egress before an audit or review
Validate your automation and AI workflow exposure.
Know what your AI-connected automations can access — before they scale.
Start 30-Day Evaluation